ANDRZEJ BOJARSKI
FAMILY LAW BARRISTER, ARBITRATOR AND MEDIATOR
  • Home
  • Family Lawyer
  • Dispute Resolver
  • Blog
  • Publications
  • About Me
  • Contact Me

New Family Court – but where are the judges?

4/24/2014

1 Comment

 
A quiet revolution took place on 22 April 2014.  In the biggest change to the courts of England and Wales for more than a generation a new Family Court was created to deal with almost all family proceedings.  Instead of the previous division of family cases between magistrates sitting in the Family Proceedings Court, judges in the County Courts and judges in the High Court there is now a single Family Court which incorporates all levels of the judiciary from lay magistrates up to and including High Court Judges.  The theory is that a single court will be able to apply its resources more flexibly to resolve family cases more efficiently.

The theory is a sound one, but theories need to be put into practice.  To put them into practice the courts need to have resources.  A key resource is to have sufficient judges with the relevant expertise to be able to decide the cases.  My experiences of the last 10 days suggest that despite the fanfare for the new Family Court, the resources to make it work in a way which is fit for the demands of consumers of legal services in the 21st Century are sorely lacking.

In the week before Easter, the last week of the old Principal Registry as a divorce county court, I was instructed to act in a substantial financial remedies final hearing.  The assets were large.  The issues were complex as the parties’ assets spanned a number of countries in Europe and beyond.  The trial bundles amounted to some 8 level arch files.  I spent several days preparing. Counsel on the other side did the same.  The costs were by any standards already very high.  The final hearing dates had been fixed 9 months earlier.  My client was non-resident and had come into the country to prepare for and appear at the hearing.  As a non-resident for tax purposes his days in the UK are precious.  Late on Friday evening before the case was due to start on the Monday we were told that no judge had yet been found to hear the case. On Monday morning that remained the situation.  Only late on Monday were we told that a judge could probably hear us for 3 days starting on Tuesday.  However, as the case would require substantial judicial reading time it was clear that we would not finish the case in the time available.  Fortunately the parties were able to reach a settlement and avoid the need for an adjournment.  It was, however, a close run thing.

A week later I found myself in the Family Court on its first day of existence on a one day final hearing.  Upon arrival at the hearing centre in a small town in the Home Counties I was met by obvious consternation amongst the court staff.  I was told there was no judge to hear the case.  After waiting until mid-afternoon we were told to come back in two weeks time when  a judge would be found to hear the case.  Both sides will incur further fees for the new hearing.  The costs were completely wasted, along with all the angst and worry the parties had already experienced in building up for what they expected to be the conclusion to their case.

Now on Thursday, only two days after the last fiasco, I sat down to begin to prepare for a final hearing due to take place next Tuesday. After reading only a little my clerk telephoned me to inform me that he had just been told that the case has been taken out of the list by the court because there is no judge.  My brief fee has been incurred by the client with nothing to show for it. I am not available on the date the case has been relisted.

All this on the back of an appeal I appeared in at the end of March 2014.  Judgment was reserved by the judge. Still there is no word as to when the parties might expect to receive the judgment on the appeal.

Is this the kind of court service which is fit for purpose?  The emotional and financial costs of preparing for final hearings are very high indeed.  The parties incur those costs only to find that the court declines to honour the booked hearing date at the last minute.  A hearing date for which the parties have already had to wait many months.

Perhaps this is deliberate policy to discourage use of the courts.  Certainly there is no better advertisement for family arbitration.  When I am instructed as an arbitrator the parties have contractually booked me to determine their case.  I am providing a service and I am expected to honour the commitment I have entered into.   The parties have paid me to read the papers and prepare for the hearing properly, so I do so.  Thoroughly and in good time.  If the parties need to change arrangements for the arbitration due to their or their lawyers’ commitments I do my best to accommodate them.  If I do not provide a good service what chance of recommendations for future appointments as an arbitrator?

Why are there not more lawyers advising their clients to ‘go private’ and arbitrate?  Surely it is only a matter of time before a lawyer faces a complaint for failing to advise a client of the savings of costs and time in arbitrating rather than facing the delays and vagaries of the courts.

1 Comment
Flat Roofing Contractors Orange link
8/6/2022 01:34:49 pm

Appreciate you bblogging this

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Andrzej Bojarski

    is an experienced family and divorce lawyer with an international profile as an advisor and advocate in the most difficult family cases. He also applies his skills to resolving family disputes by alternative dispute resolution.  Regularly called upon to lecture and write on family law issues around the world, he also provides legal commentary by social media.

    © Andrzej Bojarski. Unauthorized use and or duplication of the material contained on this blog without permission from this blog's author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Andrzej Bojarski with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

    Archives

    March 2020
    February 2020
    August 2018
    April 2018
    September 2017
    March 2017
    June 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014

    Categories

    All
    ADR
    Arbitration
    Brain Tumours
    Charity
    Child Arrangements Programme
    Children
    Cohabitation
    Common Law Marriage
    Conciliation
    Dispute Resolution Appointment
    Divorce
    Family Arbitration
    Family Court
    FHDRA
    Forum Shopping
    International Divorce
    Jungfrau Marathon
    Living Apart
    Living Together
    Mediation
    MIAM
    Negotiations
    No-nup
    Principal Registry
    Private Judging
    Privilege
    Putting Off Divorce
    Separation
    Separation Agreement
    Seperation
    The Family Home
    Without Prejudice

    RSS Feed

    This website may use cookies to provide you with the best possible visitor experience. By continuing to use this website you agree to the cookies policy.
Proudly powered by Weebly